Consent-Based Siting bills (nuclear waste)

In committee

Source: Original editorial Original synthesis from primary government sources — not archive content.

Bill / vehicle: S.101 / H.R.466 (119th Congress)
Status: In committee
Date: Introduced — in committee
Administration: Trump II
Topic: Nuclear waste siting
Sponsors: Various (119th Congress)

What it does

Would require the affirmative consent of state, local, and tribal governments before siting a nuclear-waste repository or storage facility — a deliberate break from the top-down approach that doomed Yucca Mountain in Nevada.

Why it matters

Reflects a growing bipartisan view that the path to actually storing spent fuel runs through community consent, not federal mandate. With Yucca Mountain still unfunded and stalled, these bills represent the leading alternative philosophy. In committee.

This is a bill, not law. It may be amended significantly or fail to advance — most introduced bills never become law. Check the live status via the sources below.

Primary sources

Learn the underlying ideas

New here? These concept explainers give you the background to understand what this law is actually doing.

📘 Used fuel and 'nuclear waste' →

Want the bigger picture on how policy shapes nuclear?

Explore Policy & Regulation →